Your dad has a chance to ask her a question, because he is, after all, Tim Russert. (And you are his son, which seems to be the only reason you are that close to that podium, getting ready to ask your own important question. Let's try and remember that as we spend a few minutes talking here. It'll go down much easier if you know where I'm coming from.)
Your dad, Tim, knows that almost nothing got done in the House for the four years Barack Obama held office, thanks to a Republican pledge to stop him in his tracks before he can ever get close to--horror of horrors--re-election. Nancy Pelosi is now the House minority leader. Two years ago, she was the House majority leader. She is going into at least another two years in the minority, and she's doing it willingly.
Your dad's question would almost surely center on what she thinks the Democrats can accomplish, given the stubborn intransigence of the opposition. After the President's solid win, in which more than half of the voters spoke on his behalf, will it be easier now to work with the Republicans?
I'm guessing that, or something close to it, would be his question. What I KNOW he wouldn't be asking is this question. Your question:
"Mrs. Pelosi ... some of your colleagues privately say that your decision to stay on prohibits the party from having younger leadership. It hurts the party in the long term. What's your response?"
Oh, my. Luke. Luke, Luke, Luke. You didn't.
The shit has already hit the fan big time, as you know, so there's no use in my telling you what a dumb--really dumb--question that turned out to be. Did you notice the women behind her? They were laughing at you. Then they were yelling at you. Then they were laughing at you. It was not your finest moment.
But you persisted. Even in the face of the laughing, the catcalls, after Ms. Pelosi suggested you wouldn't ask the same question of Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, you went on:
"No, excuse me," you said. "You, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Clyburn, you're all over 70. Is your decision to stay on prohibiting younger members from moving forward?"
I didn't know until this all came about that Nancy Pelosi is 72 years old. From my vantage point--three years her senior--that doesn't seem old, but to you, still so wet behind your ears, it must seem ancient.
I understand that could be a problem since you are so young and inexperienced, but, honey, I'm here to tell you that your question screams "amateur". You never, ever suggest to a woman she might be too old to do a job that men as old or older are doing or have done. Especially a woman as smart and as vibrant as Ms. Pelosi. Did you see any signs of incapacity up there?
So, come on, would you ask McConnell that same question? No, you wouldn't, and you know it. Because Mitch would first terrify you with his burning eyes and then he would eat your head.
But even after all the fuss, you had to go on pretending you were right. Later on, you tweeted this: "While Pelosi laughed off my Q as age-ist, many House Ds will privately gripe it hurts caucus that all 3 leaders are 70+."
Right now, Luke, there are 28 Senators who are over 70 years old and 53 members in the House. An even larger percentage are in their 60s, which, of course, then hopefully leads to their 70s. Who's griping again? Can you name names?
You screwed up and it isn't the first time. You're known in rapidly growing circles as the poster child for nepotism.
|Luke and Tim Russert|
You're not ready for this, and everybody but you and your keepers knows it. You got this job because of your last name and that's not good enough. You're not good enough. You're still there because the people who look the other way in order to keep you on the payroll loved and admired your dad.
He wouldn't have wanted this.
Do the right thing now, Luke. Find another line of work. You're only 27. There's something out there that you'll be good at. This isn't it.
(Cross-posted at Dagblog and Open Salon)