Tuesday, February 25, 2014

A Writer asks a Famous Writer to Stop Writing Because–Why Again?

Every writer is jealous of other writers.  Whether it’s fame or fortune or talent, we can’t help but snivel a little when they become Them and we’re still just us.

Most of us do it in silence or in the midst of a narrow group of co-commiserators.  Not many (Okay, a few, but they’re gone now) do it as publicly as a writer named Lynn Shepherd did recently when she wrote a blog post on HuffPo UK telling J.K. Rowling she’s had her turn and if she had any decency at all she’d hang it up and give someone else a chance.

Now, who is Lynn Shepherd to be telling the great Jo Rowling she’s being selfish with all that extraneous publishing now that Harry Potter is done and over?  Beats me.  I don’t know and I don’t care.  Honestly, I don’t.  I’m all for audacity and truth-telling but I can’t get past her own admission that she really doesn’t read Rowling.  It’s all about the fame and fortune.  One person apparently shouldn’t have that much.
A snippet of what she said:
"I didn’t much mind Rowling when she was Pottering about. I’ve never read a word (or seen a minute) so I can’t comment on whether the books were good, bad or indifferent. I did think it a shame that adults were reading them (rather than just reading them to their children, which is another thing altogether), mainly because there’s so many other books out there that are surely more stimulating for grown-up minds. But, then again, any reading is better than no reading, right? But The Casual Vacancy changed all that.
.It wasn’t just that the hype was drearily excessive, or that (by all accounts) the novel was no masterpiece and yet sold by the hundredweight, it was the way it crowded out everything else, however good, however worthwhile. That book sucked the oxygen from the entire publishing and reading atmosphere. And I chose that analogy quite deliberately, because I think that sort of monopoly can make it next to impossible for anything else to survive, let alone thrive. Publishing a book is hard enough at the best of times, especially in an industry already far too fixated with Big Names and Sure Things, but what can an ordinary author do, up against such a Golgomath?"
I guess you noticed that she never read any of the Harry Potter books?  Seems odd, doesn’t it, that she would then go on to say, “I did think it a shame that adults were reading them (rather than just reading them to their children, which is another thing altogether), mainly because there’s so many other books out there that are surely more stimulating for grown-up minds.”

Gulp and gasp and get outta here!  I’m a grown-up, I read a LOT.   I loved the Harry Potter books.  I felt a lot of things while reading them, but I’m pretty sure I never felt shame.

So here’s my dilemma, and I’m going to be honest about this.  I don’t much like that this person who puts herself in league with “ordinary authors” (see above) is getting all kinds of attention simply because she’s in a snit over someone else’s fame. (Check out her FB and Twitter hits.  Many more than I (sniff) ever got.  Hmmmph.)   And here I am, adding to the so thoroughly unearned attention

But why Jo Rowling?  Because she had the nerve to move on to “adult” books instead of staying in the kiddie section where she belongs?  Because people are buying her books simply because her name is J.K Rowling?  Because she doesn’t deserve it?

I have a feeling Lynn Shepherd knew exactly what she was doing with this piece.  A friend tried to warn her, but I think she saw it as the perfect attention-getter for her own books.  If that’s what it was, she failed.   Look at this (My bold):
"So this is my plea to JK Rowling.  Remember what it was like when The Cuckoo’s Calling had only sold a few boxes and think about those of us who are stuck there, because we can’t wave a wand and turn our books into overnight bestsellers merely by saying the magic word. By all means keep writing for kids, or for your personal pleasure – I would never deny anyone that – but when it comes to the adult market you’ve had your turn."
Jo Rowling’s success was anything but overnight.  I get that she's talking about her fame giving her a head start with any subsequent books, but Jo Rowling has certainly paid her dues.  There isn’t a writer on earth who doesn’t know about Rowling’s struggles while working on the first Harry Potter book.  She was a single, jobless mom living for a while on welfare and food stamps.  Her fame was not handed to her.  No magic wands.  Not by a long shot.

But, by golly, Lynn Shepherd got what she wanted.   First Huffington Post and now here.  (Oh, I’m kidding!)  I admit I’ve never read her books, but I don’t need to in order to say this:
That was a cheap trick.  I’m sorry I got pulled into it but if I hadn’t I wouldn’t have been able to say publicly that that was a cheap trick.
It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. – Albus Dumbledore”
J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
_______________

NOTE:  I wrote this post last night, before I heard there was a negative-review bomb against one of Lynn Shepherd’s books over on Amazon.  At last count I saw 44 one-stars, most of them published yesterday.  They were all paying her back for what she wrote about J.K. Rowling.

What I wrote above is fair game.  It’s my opinion, just as Lynn Shepherd’s opinion is hers.  What is happening to this writer at Amazon is an attempt to destroy a writer’s work by giving it deliberately low ratings.

I left my post as it was originally written because my thoughts about Shepherd’s piece haven’t changed, but I’m frankly appalled by the outside attacks on works that have nothing to do with what she wrote at HuffPo.  This is chilling to any writer who writes opinions on controversial subjects.

Whatever I said about cheap tricks above goes ten-fold for those who think this is a cool way to get back at her.  Get back at her for what?  I think Jo Rowling will be just fine after this.  Whatever I think about Lynn Shepherd, I don’t want to see her own career ruined over a simple thousand-word opinion.

I hope I’m not alone.
_________________________


Follow Up:  This is what Lynn Shepherd told The Guardian on 2/27/14:
 
Speaking to the Guardian today, Shepherd apologised for upsetting writers and readers alike, explaining that she had "only ever meant to raise the issue of how hard it is for new writers to get noticed and how publishing is much more of a zero sum game than people often think".
"Many writers face the same challenges and frustrations when they're just starting out, and JK Rowling did herself," Shepherd said. "She's been a phenomenal success since then and has millions of fans who are passionate about her books. That's an amazing achievement. With hindsight I'd have written my piece an entirely different way, as I never intended it to upset anyone, and I'm very sorry that it did."

10 comments:

  1. I've never read anything by Rowling or Shepherd.


    I have read more than one author, though. My guess is that there are plenty of kids and plenty of adults wandering around out there who started loving books (or loving books again) because of the Harry Potter series.


    I read Robert Heinlein and Clive Barker in junior high. Can't manage to stomach either one of them now, but they got me reading after a few years where I had not, and I've never really stopped.


    But I suppose that there are plenty of people who would like more successful competition to stop producing.


    Weird.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm pretty sure I won't read Shepherd now! If I have read anything by her in the past, it obviously was not memorable. I have read the Potter books and found them a fun escapist romp. As a teen I read massive quantities of sci-fi, mysteries, and historical fiction -- also Steinbeck, Tolstoy (yuck) and Dostoyevski (yay!). I still read almost anything -- nonfiction, sci-fi, and I do enjoy the young adult books appearing -- the dystopian depression of The Hunger Games quite consumed me, for instance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I haven't seen a follow-up from her, but I'll bet she wished she had thought about her wording a bit. I have to believe it didn't come out the way she wanted. (At least I HOPE that's the case!)

    ReplyDelete
  4. I got a kick out of her idea of "children's books". If she had read Harry Potter or the Hunger Games she would have been reading authors who were writing for a much larger audience. I've read many young adult book that were absolutely mesmerizing--and very well written.

    But beyond that, the very idea that there is a wall that rich, popular writers must not climb over is really baffling.

    ReplyDelete
  5. There is a lot of that whining going on in many fields of life it seems. A whole lot of "I can't do that, so neither should YOU."


    You know about my addiction to succinct Anglo-Saxon expressions in such circumstances, right?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, Indeedy I do, Labrys! Thank you for sparing us here. Whew!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I had the same exact reaction to that piece and posted about it over on Facebook at the time. I was particularly incensed that she had not even read the Harry Potter books, which are so much more than "children's books." I am glad she has apologized but you'd think she might have given it a bit more thought before she wrote it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. In reading her comments (from your post), I would say her apology is disingenuous damage control. I don't think you can read her comments and think she didn't say exactly what she intended to say.
    Had she wanted to describe the difficulties facing an aspiring writer why didn't she write exactly that instead of attacking another writer for her success? Ms. Shepherd suffers from the effects of a scarcity world view.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Incredible that she wrote an entire essay about an author she hasn't even read. The trouble is, once you've hit the "publish" button it's out there. Now she knows.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yes, she was very clear about her feelings in that first post. She's a little chastened in the apology, but she can't wipe away what went out. She'll have to live with it, I'm afraid. Lesson learned, but picking on her book on Amazon was unfair and over the top. And as I said--chilling.

    ReplyDelete

I welcome your input and want to keep this as open as possible, so I will watch for and delete comments that are spam, vicious or obscene. (Also, please note that I've switched to Disqus for comments. Hope this clears up any commenting problems. If not, please let me know.)